Ignición confirmada en el registro de 1,3 Megajulios

En el primer aniversario de lograr un rendimiento de más de 1,3 megajulios en la Instalación Nacional de Ignición de LLNL, los resultados científicos de este experimento récord se publicaron en tres artículos revisados ​​por pares: uno en Physical Review Letters y dos en Physical Review E. Este estilizado La imagen muestra un objetivo criogénico utilizado para estos experimentos de fusión inercial sin precedentes. Crédito: James Wickboldt / LLNL

Después de décadas de investigación sobre la fusión por confinamiento inercial, un rendimiento más allá 1,3 megajulios (MJ) se logró por primera vez el 8 de agosto de 2021. Esto puso a los científicos de la Instalación Nacional de Ignición (NIF) del Laboratorio Nacional Lawrence Livermore (LLNL) en el umbral de la ganancia de fusión y logró la ignición científica.

En el primer aniversario de este logro histórico, los resultados científicos de este experimento récord se publicaron en tres artículos revisados ​​por pares. Se publicó un documento en Cartas de revisión física y dos adentro Revisión física E. En el Cartas de revisión física artículo, se incluyeron más de 1,000 autores para reconocer y reconocer a las muchas personas que han trabajado durante muchas décadas para permitir este avance significativo.

«El récord fue un importante avance científico en la investigación de la fusión, al establecer que la ignición de la fusión en el laboratorio es posible en el NIF», dijo Omar Hurricane, científico principal del programa de fusión por confinamiento inercial del LLNL. «Lograr las condiciones necesarias para la ignición ha sido un objetivo de larga data para todas las investigaciones sobre la fusión por confinamiento inercial y abre la puerta a un nuevo régimen experimental en el que el autocalentamiento de las partículas alfa supera todos los mecanismos de enfriamiento en la fusión.[{» attribute=»»>plasma.”

The results from August 8, 2021, are described in detail in the papers. They also include the associated design, improvements, and experimental measurements. LLNL physicist Alex Zylstra, lead experimentalist and first author of the experimental Physical Review E paper, noted that in 2020 and early 2021 the Lab conducted experiments in the “burning plasma” regime for the first time. These set the stage for the record shot.

“From that design, we made several improvements to get to the August 8, 2021, shot,” he said. “Improvements to the physics design and quality of target all helped lead to the success of the August shot, which is discussed in the Physical Review E papers.”

This experiment incorporated a few important changes, including an improved target design. “Reducing the coasting-time with more efficient hohlraums compared to prior experiments was key in moving between the burning plasma and ignition regimes,” said LLNL physicist Annie Kritcher, lead designer and first author of the design Physical Review E paper. “The other main changes were improved capsule quality and a smaller fuel fill tube.”

Since the experiment last August, the researchers have been executing a series of experiments to attempt to repeat the performance and to understand the experimental sensitivities in this new regime.

“Many variables can impact each experiment,” Kritcher said. “The 192 laser beams do not perform exactly the same from shot to shot, the quality of targets varies and the ice layer grows at differing roughness on each target. These experiments provided an opportunity to test and understand the inherent variability in this new, sensitive experimental regime.”

Although the repeat attempts have not reached the same level of fusion yield as the August 2021 experiment, all of them demonstrated capsule gain greater than unity. They have had yields in the 430-700 kJ range, which are significantly higher than the previous highest yield of 170 kJ from February 2021. The data gained from these and other experiments are providing crucial clues as to what went right and what changes are needed in order to not only repeat that experiment but also exceed its performance in the future. The scientists are also utilizing the experimental data to increase understanding of the fundamental processes of fusion ignition and burn. They’re also working to enhance simulation tools in support of stockpile stewardship.

Looking ahead, the research team is working to leverage the accumulated experimental data and simulations to move toward a more robust regime – further beyond the ignition cliff – where general trends found in this new experimental regime can be better separated from variability in targets and laser performance.

Efforts to increase fusion performance and robustness are underway via improvements to the laser and improvements to the targets. Additionally, they’re working on modifications to the design that further improve energy delivery to the hotspot while maintaining or even increasing the hot-spot pressure. This includes improving the compression of the fusion fuel, increasing the amount of fuel, and other avenues.

“It is extremely exciting to have an ‘existence proof’ of ignition in the lab,” Hurricane said. “We’re operating in a regime that no researchers have accessed since the end of nuclear testing, and it’s an incredible opportunity to expand our knowledge as we continue to make progress.”

References:

“Lawson Criterion for Ignition Exceeded in an Inertial Fusion Experiment” by H. Abu-Shawareb et al. (Indirect Drive ICF Collaboration), 8 August 2022, Physical Review Letters.
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.075001

“Experimental achievement and signatures of ignition at the National Ignition Facility” by A. B. Zylstra et al., 8 August 2022, Physical Review E.
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.106.025202

“Design of an inertial fusion experiment exceeding the Lawson criterion for ignition” by A. L. Kritcher et al., 8 August 2022, Physical Review E.
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.106.025201

READ  Muere de cáncer de páncreas el 'abuelo de la UCI' que se ganó corazones acurrucando a bebés

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada.